Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Wag The Film - June 2011


We're not even at the end of June, and we're already at our third superhero action extravaganza. The previous entries, Thor and X-Men: First Class have performed well and beyond the doubts of a few naysayers, but neither have been the big-business flick that we have seen with The Dark Knight and Iron Man. Will that void be filled in by The Green Lantern or will that be reserved for the upcoming Captain America.

Even with only a few days left to its opening, it's still hard to track what can of business will be expected for Lantern. While the third superhero flick this summer, it will be the first non-Marvel property and is instead from its archrival, DC Comics. Unlike Marvel, DC has struggled with their non-Batman output lately (Superman Returns, Jonah Hex), so the success of Lantern will determine whether will be see anymore of the superhero (The Flash, Wonder Woman) grace the silver screen anytime soon.

Granted, the Green Lantern has become one of DC's most popular and best selling comic series, and it'll be interesting to see how that success will translate at the box office. The film also relays on the star-power of Ryan Reynolds, who has always proven to be a likable (if a bit smug) presence in romantic comedies, but it remains to be seen if he can truly make it as an action star (if I remember correctly, his last superhero movies were the dreadful Blade: Trinity and X-Men Origins: Wolverine). The movie is directed by Martin Campbell, best known for Goldeneye and Casino Royale, but whose non-James Bond films are not-so-successful (Vertical Limit, Edge of Darkness).

I also have to wonder whether its 3D presentations will prove to be another setback, as public interest in the format is waning, which has culminated in the underperformance of fellow summer flicks like Pirates 4 and Kung-Fu Panda 2. In the end, I expect a strong opening weekend number, but I'm uncertain whether will lead to good legs at the box office.

Opening Weekend Prediction: $65,000,000-$75,000,000



To honest, had this movie come out when I was around ten, I would be all over this. "Jim Carrey with a bunch of cute penguins? Hell yeah, sign me up!" Nowadays, I look at the trailer and see it as yet another attempt from the actor to maintain his relevance in the movie world. Not that Carrey isn't still popular, and he has still far from being another nineties comic oddity (he ain't no Pauly Shore). At the same time, it's hard to judge Carrey's popularity will go on as his recent films like Yes Man or A Christmas Carol only received a 'meh' reception when the came out. The news that Carrey may be working on sequels to Bruce Almighty and Dumb and Dumber proves that Carrey himself is aware of his battle to stay in the big league.

Mr. Popper's Penguins, an adaptation of the classic children's book, may seem to be a step in the right direction. However, the penguin-crazed that swept the nation a few years seems to have cool down a bit, which may smell trouble for this and other upcoming peguin-friendly flick, Happy Feet 2.

However, it's release is a nice bite of counter-programming to The Green Lantern, and might become of the more successful family films this Summer which is already in an action frenzy.

Opening Weekend Prediction: $25,000,000-$35,000,000
8
Vote
   



The Oscars have been in trouble from dwindling viewership and increasing lack of interest for the past few years, and they have been taking the steps to change it, to try to appeal to wider audiences, even if some of the ideas are massive flops (James Franco, anyone?). One of their biggest changes is when they announced that the list of Best Picture nominees has been stretched from the previous five to a full ten.

Clearly this decision was not brought on by mutual agreement, but was rather a product of the few feeling the backlash from those who found their favorite films being neglected in this category. The biggest example of this was in 2008 (the year before the change-up) in which the critically acclaimed and massively popular Dark Knight was ignored by the Academy, and instead gave the Best Picture slot to Oscar bait like The Reader.

While the increase at first seemed like a smart move, it soon showed cracks when it was realized that with ten nominees and still only one winner, there would be some filler. With such filler, the weight behind the award had been severely diminished. It didn't help that most were quickly able to see through the facade and found it to be a cheap attempt to boost interest/ratings in their telecast, which were seeing their losest numbers at that time. In the end, the infamously excessive Awards ceremony became even more excessive.

This morning sees yet another change in their lineup. In their statement, which outlined their alterations to their voting process (with some changeups to the best animated feature and best visual effects category) with the big one being a another change in the Best Picture category. This time around the number of nomiees could be anyway between five or ten. This is could probably the most innovative decision they have made, with the Academy now having the ablilty to recognize the movies they feel worthy of the nomination and not trample over them with filler.

I'm surprised at this change not because it was a bad idea, but because it comes so quickly after their move to ten pictures. With only two years between the changes, it seems like a very transparent recognition of their failure and subsequent apology. The ten picture lineup was such a messup that it was only a matter of time before it got replace, but I'm pleasantly surprised it was so soon. At the same time, I wondered whether any one this would have any effect on the award's popularity; would it change anything?

I don't think it's much of a secret that the Oscars have lost much in the way of credibility and respect in the past few years. Some people have grown tired are their self-serving, indulgent antics, seeing as a three-hour session of people patting themselves on the back. Of course, this was never meant to the intention of the awards or the ceremony, but rather it be an evening celebrating and appreciating the art of film. Unfortunately, this intention has fogged up by excessive lengths and unnecessary montages.

It also doesn't help that the nominations themselves don't pack much of a surprise now. Over the years, it's became obvious that the winner isn't decided by quality (even though that helps sometimes), but rather through nonstop campaigning from the studios. This campaigning has resulted in some films winning the award and being quickly forgotten after that (A Beautiful Mind, Crash, The English Patient, Shakespeare in Love). Not these are bad movies, but they hardly deserve to carry a label that belongs to other films like The Godfather or Casablanca.

It's certainly become time for the Oscars to think outside of the box in order to maintain their relevance or popularity. With "Oscar season" still a few months away, it becomes interesting to see if they have the ability to rise up beyond expectations, or disappoint yet again?
17
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
56 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Michael Lown's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Michael Lown
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]