Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Indiana Jones: 4 times as old

May 27th 2008 03:16
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a mediocrity, wrapped in an enigma tied up in a bow of expectation. I know, I died a little on the inside as well. That’s not to say that Indy 4 is horrid, far from it. There are plenty of mediocre films around, they’re perfectly watchable, they just also happen to be flawed and uneven. We accept mediocre films and give them fabulous box office rewards. I embrace mediocrity like the irritating little brother it is – loveable, but occasionally grating. I do not embrace mediocre Indiana Jones.

The movie opens perfectly. We’re straight in to the action, with Harrison Ford in whip-cracking form and classic retro villains all round. The period detail is right, and the political tensions of the day (reds under beds, the cast of Grease brawling in milk bars) provides a nice subtle score against which everything is set.


An ageing Indiana is struggling in his day job, when the son of a former love interest begs him to help save her from Russian rogues in South America. The son is Shia LaBeouf, who is a perfectly matched energetic and charismatic foil for our hero. The head Russian is Cate Blanchett, who is over the top and mesmerizing in equal doses. Ultimately all involved end up in a race to find the Crystal Skull, and its matching Kingdom.

So far, so Indy. The plot is a little leakier than usual, but a decade or so is bound to lead to incontinence. Almost every other character but the described three seems to be there to provide necessary information. This is a little annoying when you consider two of those characters are played by John Hurt and Ray Winstone, who are wasted. Even Marion Ravenwood, recurring from the first movie (if you didn’t know that already, you probably don’t even care about the series anyway) goes from initially invigorating to incredibly schmaltzy.


I can pinpoint where the movie ultimately jumps the shark. It’s the point when Shia starts swinging through the trees like Tarzan in order to catch up with the three car chase hurtling towards the cliff. And he’s assisted by a gang of monkeys. Indiana has never been about realism, but somehow it’s always stayed away from farce. Until that point.

Then there’s the realisation of what the Crystal Skull is (which the audience has figured out an hour earlier) which sends it into the X Files zone. At the same time, you can’t help but have the strangest sense of deja vu. It feels like you’ve seen some of these plot points before, only with Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz. Finally, as the closing credits roll, and you play the climax in your head the strangest thing occurs to you. Everything Indiana did (aside from initially rescuing his friends) ends up being completely irrelevant and pointless. His actions were actually unnecessary. This does not an equation for satisfaction make.

Most of the disappointment is our fault. We allowed this movie to be over-hyped like hype was in short-supply. Hype is never in short supply (see Sex and the City). I like to think that in a year’s time, once it’s all died away, I will be able to view this again and enjoy it the way I enjoy the first three in the franchise. All giddy adventure, less vague amusement and recognition. All the ingredients are there, it’s just the writing that runs out of puff.
140
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
7 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Aimzster

May 27th 2008 06:33
I had high hopes for this film but was bitterly disappointed. A lot of people said it's just as good as The Last Crusade but I honestly don't know what drugs they were on when they were watching the movie. 30 mins into it and I wished it would end already. They should have ended it as a trilogy.

Comment by Brad Gaylard

May 28th 2008 01:36
Spot on... this almost exactly reflects my own feelings of the film. Good review.

Comment by Jess Paine

May 28th 2008 02:48
Hi Aimzster,
It is almost irritating that they even bothered with a new movie. Aside from the nostalgia value, they've taken a bit of a shine off a well-loved and remembered trilogy. I suppose George Lucas has form in that area...

Comment by Jess Paine

May 28th 2008 02:59
Hey Brad,
Just checked out your review of INdy - we are definitely on the same page. It's fun, but certainly not a worthy successor. Also, any attempt to use Shia in a spin-off would reek of a cash grab.

Comment by Anonymous

May 28th 2008 03:33
Yep, pretty disappointing. The monkey swinging was way too much and the alien artifact was just a terrible choice of the treasure in this movie. The ark was ok, the stones were cool and the holy grail was great. Couldn't they have thought up something a bit more tangible?

Karen Allen is just plain Ick. Reminds me of that mummy from Thundercats crossed with one of the aliens the crystal skull belongs to.

How many rides do you think Disneyland will base off of this one?

Comment by Brad Gaylard

May 28th 2008 03:44
I'm almost surprised the film wasn't called Henry Jones Jr and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

Seriously... he isn't Indiana Jones any more in this film - he's Henry Jones Jr.

Comment by Jess Paine

May 28th 2008 04:03
I believe the next one will be named Henry Jones: Revenge of the Sith, and the next artifact will be the Millenium Falcon, or the skull of Darth Vader. Think of the merchandise tie-ins.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
47 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Michael Lown's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Michael Lown
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]